Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations/Failed

From Zelda Dungeon Wiki
< Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations
Revision as of 18:36, May 3, 2014 by Emma (talk | contribs) (Protected "Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations/Failed": Archive page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
This is an archive page, and its contents may not be current.
There are currently no archives.

The following contains sections of article nominations that have received at least five signed opposing points and therefore failed to be nominated.

Lanayru (Light Spirit)

LanayruBox.png

Lanayru plays a prominent role in Twilight Princess, serving as one of the four major Light Spirits in the game. There are plenty of references, at least three images, and a sufficient amount of information within this article. This page covers details from Lanayru's entrance, to his departure at the end of the game. I believe that this article deserves to be nominated. Atticus 09:55, January 27, 2013 (CST)

Support

Oppose

  1. While this page does have a decent amount of info, I think it could be greatly expanded on. It's good, just not nomination-worthy just yet. Fused shadows 20:14, January 28, 2013 (CST)
  2. There is also a lack of sections -- Tael 09:46, February 26, 2013 (CST)
  3. Like what Fused and Tael stated, this page has a good amount of information, but the lack of layout/sections makes this page not as good as other pages. This page could be expanded on and is not a page worthy of being nominated. :) Odd300 :) 14:48, March 10, 2013 (CDT)
  4. This page, while written well, just doesn't seem like the type of article that would be featured on the main page. Sure it has a lot of information, but it also has a distinct lack of sections, which cause a great wall of text making it much harder for the visitor to find the information they desire. It could also do with some more images and whatnot. A no from me, for now.Justac00lguy (talk) 16:17, December 26, 2013 (MST)
  5. I hate to be the conclusive vote here, but... I have to agree with what everyone has said previously. I think this page could be featured in the future -- it's certainly on its way -- but at the moment, it's not ready. Like JC said, it definitely could use some organizing and some nice headers to break it up, and more images would be good. Besides, it still has not been updated with the ability to combine references, which was added a long time ago. Speaking of references, the second half of the page -- meaning the third and fourth paragraph -- are severely lacking in them for some odd reason. Yeah, there's still a lot that could be done here. Heroine of Time (talk) 02:56, December 31, 2013 (MST)

Total

5