Talk:Twilight Princess Bokoblins: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've been taking a good look at this page for about a week now and I've finally deemed it rather redundant. We already have a page for Bokoblin in general, why must there be a page that specifies only ''Twilight Princess'' ' Bokoblin? I feel this should be redirected to Bokoblin, or just deleted entirely. Your thoughts? [[User:Atticus|Atticus]] 19:42, September 13, 2012 (CDT) | I've been taking a good look at this page for about a week now and I've finally deemed it rather redundant. We already have a page for Bokoblin in general, why must there be a page that specifies only ''Twilight Princess'' ' Bokoblin? I feel this should be redirected to Bokoblin, or just deleted entirely. Your thoughts? [[User:Atticus|Atticus]] 19:42, September 13, 2012 (CDT) | ||
:At the very least they should be moved to [[Bokoblin Warrior]], if that is indeed their name as the article text suggests. Where does this name come from? They aren't mentioned in the text dump. {{User:Locke/sig}} 21:25, September 13, 2012 (CDT) | :At the very least they should be moved to [[Bokoblin|Bokoblin Warrior]], if that is indeed their name as the article text suggests. Where does this name come from? They aren't mentioned in the text dump. {{User:Locke/sig}} 21:25, September 13, 2012 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:11, April 23, 2013
I've been taking a good look at this page for about a week now and I've finally deemed it rather redundant. We already have a page for Bokoblin in general, why must there be a page that specifies only Twilight Princess ' Bokoblin? I feel this should be redirected to Bokoblin, or just deleted entirely. Your thoughts? Atticus 19:42, September 13, 2012 (CDT)
- At the very least they should be moved to Bokoblin Warrior, if that is indeed their name as the article text suggests. Where does this name come from? They aren't mentioned in the text dump. << Locke(T·C) >> 21:25, September 13, 2012 (CDT)