8
edits
Link: The Faces of Evil: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
→Development
(→Story) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Development== | ==Development== | ||
The creation of Link: The Faces of Evil, and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon, has very interesting roots. Wishing to compete with the Sega CD, Nintendo signed a deal with Sony in 1889 to create a similar CD based console known as the "Nintendo PlayStation", or the SNES CD which would be an add-on for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System. This would mean that games could be larger and have improved graphics. However, Nintendo broke the deal with Sony and instead signed a deal with Philips to make a similar console. This influenced Sony to use their add-on to make an entirely new console, known as the Playstation. After seeing how the poor results of the Sega Mega-CD, Nintendo stopped the whole add-on idea altogether. After breaking the contract with Philips, Nintendo agreed to give them the license to five Nintendo characters, including Link, Princess Zelda, and Ganon, for use on Philip's console, the CD-i. After getting contracts with several third-party studios, Philips decided to use the characters to create three games for the CD-i. Nintendo took no part in development of the games, except in giving advice on the look of the characters, which were based on the artwork from the Original Legend of Zelda and it's sequel, The Adventure of Link, along with their instructional booklets. Philip wanted the developers to take advantage of all the features the CD-i had to offer, including FMV (Full Motion Video), high-resolution graphics, and CD-quality music. As the system wasn't designed as a gaming console first, there were some technical problems with the system and it's controller. These problems included laggy controls, and many troubles with the audio, graphics, saving memory, and the disk access. Despite all these problems, when the first two games were shown at the 1993 CES, the audience was amazed by the quality and fluidity of the animation. | |||
==Reception== | ==Reception== | ||