Josh: Why is your gut telling you to vote for me and what do you think of musicfan?
When playing mafia I generally like to come in with the notion that everyone is town. Now this probably an awful viewpoint, but I try and hold myself to it. People sway my opinions over time, but I like to give everyone a chance to keep that rank.
As Day one progressed you voted for Raindrop, then I voted for Raindrop. I kept my vote on her (which was obviously a mistake), but she was still the best lead I could get on Day one of a mafia game. She never responded to my logic until like 10 pages later after someone brought it up another two times. She was evasive, and I don't care if you are the vig or not, claiming vig on Day one, or even claiming vig at all, is hard to believe.
But the thing is, you unvoted right before Raindrop got lynched. Like, hours before. You play it off as trying to pressure people into claiming who they are, but for whatever reason I don't believe that story. It's a great story and it makes sense, but I think pressure voting is getting a few votes on someone a few days before they get lynched, not enough so that they die even when they claim vig. And hell, what if Raindrop was mafia and claimed vig? Would you still have unvoted if the real vig didn't say anything?
If you were to believe that your pressure voting tactic would work you would need votes to actually put pressure on someone. Thus, you would almost have to lead a bandwagon or provide credible evidence to make people vote for her and find out where her true loyalties lie. But what happens then?
Do you just throw caution to the wind? Oh good, I figured out Raindrop was the vig! Oh ****, too bad she's dead now. Either this tactic is useless unless you find a mafia role of some importance (which is like, rare), or you're just throwing punches for the hell of it.
Then Day 2 comes around and you make a standard oh bad last lynch post.....but then you start throwing rocks at someone else and using the same tactic continually. I don't know about you, but when I started playing mafia I was taught to look back at the previous day and see who led bandwagons (or who jumped on them, I guess) and start prosecuting them. Not Thareous, some random *** player that made a post against the person that I would almost completely blame for just lynching the vig.
Keyshe died during the night. Now, from what I got from Keyshe, she wasn't all there on Day 1. It reminds me of.....Pokemon Mafia where I killed illmatic with my special Godfather abilities because he was an irrelevant player. No suspicions would arise from his death, and certainly not me or my fellow mafia would die because of it. That leads me to believe if a mafia were to use that same logic, then Keyshe died because we were not onto scum, and the mafia didn't feel the need to kill whoever might be targeting them. Night 1 kill, who really cares, right?
And then you start targeting Thareous. Which as I think I mentioned before, was some random *** player who made some random *** post criticizing you, and you're leading this tirade for which I personally don't agree with. I may have been wrong myself with Raindrop, but I don't believe at all that Thareous is scum. I may not be able to entirely prove why, but I personally couldn't believe that an experienced mafia player such as yourself would make such a bad mistake twice.
Ever since day two started I've been trying to decide for myself whether you or Annie are scum. I know one of you are, but I don't get that vibe from her. I think she's either town, but I'm leaning more to third-party as this day drags on. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. Certainly not as bad as mafia.
/logic
And Annie, since you asked so nicely, I would give you a rating of -/10.
Oh, and since I forgot to mention it, musicfan may be scum. I don't know, and frankly I don't care too much. I still get the newness vibe from him, but I don't seem as much of a threat.
* I don't see him as much of a threat
