Hey guys, I was glancing over Caleb of Asui's thread, and read some of the posts. This is part of the edited original post.
Based on what we knew at the time, and what we know now... What actually has more 'evidence' to support that order. Are either of these universally accepted?
I found it to be rather awkward that what appears to be rational conclusions of what we had after 5 games... and what Miyamoto stated differ.
I didn't want to interrupt the other thread... so i made this one. If there really is a lot more to this, I was curious to know if there was interest in giving a rather detailed explanation. Perhaps with the inclusion of images/quotes from the games/manuals/interviews, we could produce a rather detailed article that could be posted at the site.
What are your thoughts?
5. Ocarina of Time
- Skipped -
Reason: It is obviously before everything so far. Nobody's about to say otherwise.
Order so Far: OoT--ALttP/LA--LoZ/AoL
5.1 Miyamoto Order
- Discussion Closed -
Details: We hit a snag when the creator came out with an order contradicting what we already have. He says OoT--LoZ/AoL--ALttP, with LA going anywhere.
Conclusion: Ocarina of Time was originally meant as the Seal War, with The Legend of Zelda as a lesser part of it, explaining what happens to the Triforce. At least, this was true at the time.
Order so Far: OoT--LoZ/AoL--ALttP/LA
Based on what we knew at the time, and what we know now... What actually has more 'evidence' to support that order. Are either of these universally accepted?
I found it to be rather awkward that what appears to be rational conclusions of what we had after 5 games... and what Miyamoto stated differ.
I didn't want to interrupt the other thread... so i made this one. If there really is a lot more to this, I was curious to know if there was interest in giving a rather detailed explanation. Perhaps with the inclusion of images/quotes from the games/manuals/interviews, we could produce a rather detailed article that could be posted at the site.
What are your thoughts?