3,554
edits
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations/Failed: Difference between revisions
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations/Failed (view source)
Revision as of 17:49, July 28, 2014
, July 28, 2014no edit summary
m (Protected "Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations/Failed": Archive page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#This page, while written well, just doesn't seem like the type of article that would be featured on the main page. Sure it has a lot of information, but it also has a distinct lack of sections, which cause a great wall of text making it much harder for the visitor to find the information they desire. It could also do with some more images and whatnot. A no from me, for now.[[User:Justac00lguy|Justac00lguy]] ([[User talk:Justac00lguy|talk]]) 16:17, December 26, 2013 (MST) | #This page, while written well, just doesn't seem like the type of article that would be featured on the main page. Sure it has a lot of information, but it also has a distinct lack of sections, which cause a great wall of text making it much harder for the visitor to find the information they desire. It could also do with some more images and whatnot. A no from me, for now.[[User:Justac00lguy|Justac00lguy]] ([[User talk:Justac00lguy|talk]]) 16:17, December 26, 2013 (MST) | ||
#I hate to be the conclusive vote here, but... I have to agree with what everyone has said previously. I think this page could be featured in the future -- it's certainly on its way -- but at the moment, it's not ready. Like JC said, it definitely could use some organizing and some nice headers to break it up, and more images would be good. Besides, it still has not been updated with the ability to combine references, which was added a long time ago. Speaking of references, the second half of the page -- meaning the third and fourth paragraph -- are severely lacking in them for some odd reason. Yeah, there's still a lot that could be done here. [[User:Heroine of Time|Heroine of Time]] ([[User talk:Heroine of Time|talk]]) 02:56, December 31, 2013 (MST) | #I hate to be the conclusive vote here, but... I have to agree with what everyone has said previously. I think this page could be featured in the future -- it's certainly on its way -- but at the moment, it's not ready. Like JC said, it definitely could use some organizing and some nice headers to break it up, and more images would be good. Besides, it still has not been updated with the ability to combine references, which was added a long time ago. Speaking of references, the second half of the page -- meaning the third and fourth paragraph -- are severely lacking in them for some odd reason. Yeah, there's still a lot that could be done here. [[User:Heroine of Time|Heroine of Time]] ([[User talk:Heroine of Time|talk]]) 02:56, December 31, 2013 (MST) | ||
====Total==== | |||
{{NumberColor|-5}} | |||
{{Clear}} | |||
===[[Octorok]]=== | |||
[[File:Octorok-grass.png|right]] | |||
Octorok has been a very notable enemy, appearing in every game save Twilight Princess. It's only appropriate that such a notable enemy has a very complete article. While I wouldn't say this article is at its maximum potential, it certainly is far more complete than most of what we have on this Wiki. [[User:Zenox|Zenox]] 18:30, January 8, 2013 (CST) | |||
====Support==== | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
# While this page does have a decent amount of info, it is still not up to par with what we can do. The formatting is sloppy, the writing is vague, and it doesn't have a nice wiki-looking-like look. [[User:Fused shadows|Fused shadows]] 20:49, January 24, 2013 (CST) | |||
# Like what Fused said, the page has a good amount of info. However, it falls short from other great pages from bad formatting, its broad way of writing, and not a good layout/look. [[User:Odd300|:) Odd300 :)]] 13:32, January 27, 2013 (CST) | |||
# Unfortunately, I believe that the very reason stated for this article's nomination is its downfall. The Octorok IS a very notable enemy, and it SHOULD have a very complete article -- but this isn't it. Many sections are small and insufficient. The gallery is expansive, but far from complete, with obvious omissions like the DS titles. The page as a whole seems very haphazard and disorganized; the pictures should probably be spread across the article a bit more to make it seem less like a ton of tiny sections of text. It's hard to get a nomination-worthy page for an enemy with so many appearances, and while it can be done, this is far from it. [[User:Heroine of Time|Heroine of Time]] ([[User talk:Heroine of Time|talk]]) 02:56, December 31, 2013 (MST) | |||
# Zenox for HN. Anyhow, I don't tthink this article is up to the standards of what a general enemy page should appear like, I.e. Deku Baba.[[User: A LINK IN TIME|A LINK IN TIME]] ([[User Talk: A LINK IN TIME|talk]]) | |||
# Yeah pretty much everything has been covered for why this ''shouldn't'' be featured yet. So just placing my vote. [[User:Justac00lguy|Justac00lguy]] ([[User talk:Justac00lguy|talk]]) 15:51, July 14, 2014 (MDT) | |||
====Negated==== | |||
<s>i love the octoroct but also they are kind of annoying to deflect there shots in skyward sword --[[User:Shoaraphah|Shoaraphah]] ([[User talk:Shoaraphah|talk]]) 14:43, June 30, 2014 (MDT)--[[User:Shoaraphah|Shoaraphah]] ([[User talk:Shoaraphah|talk]]) 14:43, June 30, 2014 (MDT) shoaraphah</s> | |||
:Personal like or dislike of a subject is not valid grounds for a vote according to the rules. [[User:Heroine of Time|Heroine of Time]] ([[User talk:Heroine of Time|talk]]) 12:24, July 3, 2014 (MDT) | |||
====Total==== | ====Total==== | ||
{{NumberColor|-5}} | {{NumberColor|-5}} | ||