3,554
edits
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations: Difference between revisions
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations (view source)
Revision as of 05:00, July 19, 2016
, July 19, 2016Text replacement - "User:Matt" to "User:Emma"
m (Archiving) |
m (Text replacement - "User:Matt" to "User:Emma") |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
# I'm going to have to say no. We can't just feature an entire group of pages at once. It takes away from any one page and each page should be getting featured on its own merit. As good as the pages might be as a whole, they need to be voted in individually, and that might not go well then because they'd just be one of many in that case. I wouldn't be opposed to a new system to highlight groups of pages for their worth (which would be something interesting that other wikis don't offer), but that wouldn't work here for featured, individual, articles. The way the system is set up just wouldn't allow it. — {{User: | # I'm going to have to say no. We can't just feature an entire group of pages at once. It takes away from any one page and each page should be getting featured on its own merit. As good as the pages might be as a whole, they need to be voted in individually, and that might not go well then because they'd just be one of many in that case. I wouldn't be opposed to a new system to highlight groups of pages for their worth (which would be something interesting that other wikis don't offer), but that wouldn't work here for featured, individual, articles. The way the system is set up just wouldn't allow it. — {{User:Emma/Sig}} 12:46, May 3, 2014 (MDT) | ||
====Total==== | ====Total==== | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
# Yes. I thought this page would have been nominated earlier to be honest. It's very well structured, detailed and well written, a good amount of pictures in the gallery, and tons references. Overall just a really great page on the Wiki. [[User:Justac00lguy|Justac00lguy]] ([[User talk:Justac00lguy|talk]]) 11:25, October 29, 2014 (MDT) | # Yes. I thought this page would have been nominated earlier to be honest. It's very well structured, detailed and well written, a good amount of pictures in the gallery, and tons references. Overall just a really great page on the Wiki. [[User:Justac00lguy|Justac00lguy]] ([[User talk:Justac00lguy|talk]]) 11:25, October 29, 2014 (MDT) | ||
#I liked this one. Just stumbled across it when I needed a page with a lot of references and wow did it have a lot. It makes a perfect example of everything you need to have for a character page. Every relevant piece of information is in there somewhere.— {{User: | #I liked this one. Just stumbled across it when I needed a page with a lot of references and wow did it have a lot. It makes a perfect example of everything you need to have for a character page. Every relevant piece of information is in there somewhere.— {{User:Emma/Sig}} 19:20, July 22, 2015 (UTC) | ||
# Yes. This article is full of information and is well written. It also has great pictures and trivia. I'm surprised that it hasn't been nominated already. [[User:ZD Wiki Editor|ZD Wiki Editor]] ([[User talk:ZD Wiki Editor|talk]]) 05:23, May 4, 2016 (UTC) | # Yes. This article is full of information and is well written. It also has great pictures and trivia. I'm surprised that it hasn't been nominated already. [[User:ZD Wiki Editor|ZD Wiki Editor]] ([[User talk:ZD Wiki Editor|talk]]) 05:23, May 4, 2016 (UTC) | ||