17,230
edits
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
→Timeline
m (Reverted edits by Zeldazeldazelda (talk) to last revision by Locke) |
|||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
==Timeline== | ==Timeline== | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
|A-| |--B---| |-----C-----| |---D---| | |A-| |--B---| |-----C-----| |---D---| | ||
Legend: MC - FS/FSA - LttP/OoX/LA - LoZ/AoL | Legend: MC - FS/FSA - LttP/OoX/LA - LoZ/AoL - LBW - TFH - BotW | ||
History: SS - OoT - Great Flood - WW/PH - ST | History: SS - OoT - Great Flood - WW/PH - ST | ||
/MM - TP | /MM - TP | ||
| Line 124: | Line 123: | ||
D: Reconstruction Era | D: Reconstruction Era | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
It | |||
This is the timeline that I created and supported pre-Historia, updated with recent games. It supports the three-way split after OoT, but instead of the cop-out "what-if", I use a retcon of sorts: LttP was the sequel to OoT until WW bumped it out of the way, then FSA replaced OoT as LttP's prequel. The stories along the vertical axis, i.e. in the same era but on different timelines, match up quite nicely. I believe my timeline is still relevant because the developers view the "official" timeline as an interpretation of what's known of the history and still up for debate: | |||
<pre> | |||
Fujibayashi: Lately within the company, a term called ‘New Translation’ has cropped up. (laughs) Strictly speaking, we don’t change it, but rather new information and truths come to light. | |||
Famitsu: I see, so the way to interpret the lore of Breath of the Wild is still up for academic debate. (laughs) | |||
Fujibayashi: That’s why you should pay attention to future studies as well! Please look forward to it. (laughs) | |||
</pre> | |||
==A History in Quotes== | ==A History in Quotes== | ||