Then I'll come back when I do, but there's things a person can do before establishing their own kingdom that makes a significant difference. I've never said that Ryu is entirely wrong, but using a theory to confirm a theory is the only thing I have a problem with this thread.
Its not using a theory to prove a theory its using Evidence to come to a plausibly logical resolution, without Bias interfering with perspective. The only way to do this is to research your topic and use all relevant slices of information, to gain the most enlightened perspective on the discussion at hand.
Using this theory:
How is the explanation of the in game evidence a "theory"?
Just because you believe in a theory, doesn't make it not a theory. No matter how solid or compelling it may be. A theory is still a theory until it's expectically said by the source.
zeldadungeon.net
If you look back, I have only based the evidence for this theory on how the Master sword reacts to the Zoni fuse ability. I've been saying from the beginning, that no mater when yo place Rauru's rule, it has no effect on the theory because the tech. in question would need to exist before that.
I'm fine with this, as long as you do your do diligence.
Unfortunately, the memories are important to know, even if you look them up separately, and watch them. For completion sake, you might also want to look up the Chamberlain's recordings. From what we can gather from both sources, King Rauru had no clue what the Master Sword was, in TotK. When Zelda told the people in the past about Link and his blade, it was all unheard of information. Sage Rauru, of OoT is a different story, and some people think he is an entirely different person. I'm fine with the idea that they are the same person, but that is a whole separate theory.
I'll be sure to do my due diligence before commenting further.Go get your answers. I'm done here.Spoiler - The case for Rauru's early reign; before Skyward Sword
At this time, as far as I have found, there are a number of problems with the past that Zelda was sent to, in Tears of the Kingdom, taking place after Skyward Sword. Why after Skyward Sword does not work. * There is no recognition of the Master Sword, when Zelda talks about it, and her only...
-------------------------------------------
If you look back, I have only based the evidence for this theory on how the Master sword reacts to the Zoni fuse ability. I've been saying from the beginning, that no mater when yo place Rauru's rule, it has no effect on the theory because the tech. in question would need to exist before that.
I bring in my other theory information as a rebuttal to the idea that we don't see any evidence of that tech in Skyward Sword, and because some individuals here would rather debate the placement of Rauru's rule, rather than interacting with the origional question.
I'm fine with this, as long as you do your do diligence.
Unfortunately, the memories are important to know, even if you look them up separately, and watch them. For completion sake, you might also want to look up the Chamberlain's recordings. From what we see can gather from both sources, King Rauru had no clue what the Master Sword was, in TotK. When Zelda told the people in the past about Link and his blade, it was all unheard of information. Sage Rauru, of OoT is a different story, and some people think he is an entirely different person. I'm fine with the idea that they are the same person, but that is a whole separate theory.
I'm sorry, but this is just using a theory that contradicts established canon as the grounds for another theory. That's the big reason I haven't touched it.Go get your answers. I'm done here.Spoiler - The case for Rauru's early reign; before Skyward Sword
At this time, as far as I have found, there are a number of problems with the past that Zelda was sent to, in Tears of the Kingdom, taking place after Skyward Sword. Why after Skyward Sword does not work. * There is no recognition of the Master Sword, when Zelda talks about it, and her only...
why bias can be dangerous. need to take a 3rd person approach to the subject and play your own version of
No, that's where you can go to discuss the theory you want to discuss, rather than keep trying to derail this one. Unless you have something useful to add to this theory, I am done.
