Pointless statistics (and statistics in general) in mafia games are rarely helpful and more often than not are just annoying. Being suspicious of someone for having the exact same likelihood as any other player in the game goes beyond that. If that's not flawed reasoning, I don't even know what is.
Storm, is your vote still on Zachie because you're genuinely suspicious of him? If so, then why? If it's still because of something that was very obviously a joke that started before roles were even sent out, then you're reaching way further than you need to, which is suspicious in and of itself. Domo did the same thing, and while it's flawed, in his case it's coming from a newbie (though it's still something to keep in mind for later), whereas you have more than a year's worth of games behind you. Surely, you see the flaws in your logic?
With this being said, I doubt both Storm and Domo would be scumbuds. So if one of them are scum, the other probably is not.
My vote is on him because no one else is popping out, and we have less than 24 hours. I find him scummy as I find you scummy. Hypocritical as it sounds, a claim day 1 is not a saving card unless it's your first game and the town kind of needs you. I am wary of us lynching the Jailkeeper by mistake. I am not sure If I unvoted Zachie earlier, but
UNVOTE
They could, of course, both be town though.
So where do I look now? Well, tbh, Storm's actions in this game are the only ones I would truly consider scummy, but I see it as no more than Storm being himself; ergo, it's not exactly alignment indicative.
It's because I'm talking. I'm the only one who is talking. I've been shut out for 3 months, and from you for longer. If I talk long enough, maybe we'll find scum finally, and keep this Town winning streak going