Flagpole
I'm back!!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2009
Right now, while I was inside the bathroom D) I thought of this theory which, maybe, may affect how other people think when talking about split timelines:
The child and adult timelines are only separated by a relatively small amount of years: 7.
Thus, supposing two games (Game A and Game have a 100 years differnce than both timelines, Game A and Game B being one in the adult timeline and the other in the child timeline, Link would actually, in the same life, go through Game A, then seven years later through Game B, and then the two timelines join together, as Link actually grows up (so Game A, in fact, would take place 93 years later after Link beats Ganon, and Game B, 107 years later after Link beats Ganon and goes to the past thanks to Princess Zelda.
I do think this is a poor theory, even after saying before it could affect how people theorize on timelines, but, yeah, people can easily break this theory, perfectly disagreeing with it.
The child and adult timelines are only separated by a relatively small amount of years: 7.
Thus, supposing two games (Game A and Game have a 100 years differnce than both timelines, Game A and Game B being one in the adult timeline and the other in the child timeline, Link would actually, in the same life, go through Game A, then seven years later through Game B, and then the two timelines join together, as Link actually grows up (so Game A, in fact, would take place 93 years later after Link beats Ganon, and Game B, 107 years later after Link beats Ganon and goes to the past thanks to Princess Zelda.
I do think this is a poor theory, even after saying before it could affect how people theorize on timelines, but, yeah, people can easily break this theory, perfectly disagreeing with it.