544
edits
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations: Difference between revisions
Want an adless experience? Log in or Create an account.
Zelda Dungeon Wiki:Featured Article Nominations (view source)
Revision as of 01:25, March 12, 2023
, March 12, 2023no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
====Total==== | ====Total==== | ||
{{NumberColor| | {{NumberColor|4}} | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
# I'm going to have to say no. We can't just feature an entire group of pages at once. It takes away from any one page and each page should be getting featured on its own merit. As good as the pages might be as a whole, they need to be voted in individually, and that might not go well then because they'd just be one of many in that case. I wouldn't be opposed to a new system to highlight groups of pages for their worth (which would be something interesting that other wikis don't offer), but that wouldn't work here for featured, individual, articles. The way the system is set up just wouldn't allow it. — {{User:Emma/Sig}} 12:46, May 3, 2014 (MDT) | # I'm going to have to say no. We can't just feature an entire group of pages at once. It takes away from any one page and each page should be getting featured on its own merit. As good as the pages might be as a whole, they need to be voted in individually, and that might not go well then because they'd just be one of many in that case. I wouldn't be opposed to a new system to highlight groups of pages for their worth (which would be something interesting that other wikis don't offer), but that wouldn't work here for featured, individual, articles. The way the system is set up just wouldn't allow it. — {{User:Emma/Sig}} 12:46, May 3, 2014 (MDT) | ||
# I agree with Emma. The concept of the Featured Article is that ''one'' article is featured on the Main Page. The other nominations are singular articles. You could nominate the best of the articles, and it wouldn't contradict the idea of the Article Nomination system. [[User:TheDoctor8910|TheDoctor8910]] ([[User talk:TheDoctor8910|talk]]) 21:46, October 19, 2018 (UTC) | |||
====Total==== | ====Total==== | ||
{{NumberColor| | {{NumberColor|3}} | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
===[[Oocca]]=== | ===[[Oocca]]=== | ||
[[File: | [[File:Oocca-Race.png|150px|right]] | ||
This page is probably one of the better ones we have regarding a Zelda Race. It has full sections regarding the Oocca's origin, physical characteristics, and in-game relevance. It is also packed with images and references, and has a nice trivia section. It is the peak of a page for Races, and I think it'd be great to have it as a featured article. {{User:Fused shadows/Sig}} 12:11, January 3, 2014 (MST) | This page is probably one of the better ones we have regarding a Zelda Race. It has full sections regarding the Oocca's origin, physical characteristics, and in-game relevance. It is also packed with images and references, and has a nice trivia section. It is the peak of a page for Races, and I think it'd be great to have it as a featured article. {{User:Fused shadows/Sig}} 12:11, January 3, 2014 (MST) | ||
| Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
#I liked this one. Just stumbled across it when I needed a page with a lot of references and wow did it have a lot. It makes a perfect example of everything you need to have for a character page. Every relevant piece of information is in there somewhere.— {{User:Emma/Sig}} 19:20, July 22, 2015 (UTC) | #I liked this one. Just stumbled across it when I needed a page with a lot of references and wow did it have a lot. It makes a perfect example of everything you need to have for a character page. Every relevant piece of information is in there somewhere.— {{User:Emma/Sig}} 19:20, July 22, 2015 (UTC) | ||
# Yes. This article is full of information and is well written. It also has great pictures and trivia. I'm surprised that it hasn't been nominated already. [[User:ZD Wiki Editor|ZD Wiki Editor]] ([[User talk:ZD Wiki Editor|talk]]) 05:23, May 4, 2016 (UTC) | # Yes. This article is full of information and is well written. It also has great pictures and trivia. I'm surprised that it hasn't been nominated already. [[User:ZD Wiki Editor|ZD Wiki Editor]] ([[User talk:ZD Wiki Editor|talk]]) 05:23, May 4, 2016 (UTC) | ||
# Yes. This article is extremely well written and has very good information, overall, this is a very good page. [[User:HappyMaskSalesman64|HappyMaskSalesman64]] ([[User talk:HappyMaskSalesman64|talk]]) 17:24, July 13, 2020 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Total==== | |||
{{NumberColor|4}} | |||
{{Clear}} | |||
===[[Ganon]]=== | |||
[[File:Dark Beast Ganon.png|right|120px]] | |||
Ganon has an extensive and rather detailed page that has yet to be featured. Providing information from every game he appears or is even referenced in, the page doesn't leave any room for a lack of information. The page is one of the longer pages on the wiki, but that just means it has more details. It has graphics to accompany each appearance, and provides many trivial facts. The page definitely deserves at least the acknowledgment of being nominated. [[User:TheDoctor8910|TheDoctor8910]] ([[User talk:TheDoctor8910|talk]]) 02:00, October 20, 2018 (UTC) | |||
====Support==== | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Total==== | |||
{{NumberColor|0}} | |||
{{Clear}} | |||
==[[Great Plateau]]== | |||
[[File:Great-Plateau.jpg|right|300px]] | |||
For starters it's been 11 months since this last changed, but also: the Great Plateau has one of the most detailed and well-written specifically BotW pages, and as the starting point of the most recently released Legend of Zelda game, it definitely deserves some attention on the main page. [[User:AZeldaPlayer24|AZeldaPlayer24]] ([[User talk:AZeldaPlayer24|talk]]) 08:32, June 5, 2021 (UTC) | |||
====Support==== | |||
# I support this article, but I do have a problem with the reason. The problem is: why is it so important that the article was last edited 11 months ago? I mean it's not like it's an important part of the article that it was ''specifically'' edited 11 months ago....that's pretty much all I have to say. [[User:Wolfgangstein]] 12:58, November 4, 2021 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
====Total==== | ====Total==== | ||
{{NumberColor| | |||
{{NumberColor|0}} | |||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||