Timeline V2.0

[i-am-link]

Okay, here it is:

Legend:
xx-xx = Indirect Sequel
xx/xx = Direct Sequel
/-xx
xx = Timeline Split
\xx
xx-> = Continuing Timeline

******/-WW/PH-ST-MC-FS/FSA->
SS-OoT
******\MM-TP-LttP/LA->

And here's the Link-gets-defeated What-If Split:

~LoZ/AoL->

Tell me what you think.

 

[JuicieJ]

This is the third one today that I've had to say "there's an official Nintendo timeline now".

Sorry, but timeline theories are a thing of the past. x.x

 

[Fierce_Deity]

Maybe that image needs to be stickied and a request that no more timeline theories be posted? Seems only debate now is how the third split is created.

 

[clavier223]

There are waaaay too many timeline threads on this forum.

 

[guapo2003]

The timeline still doesn't make any sense.

 

[Locke]

You include a "what-if" split as if just because one has been confirmed, but why not just use the entire confirmed timeline? If you aren't going to follow the official timeline, then elements from that timeline wouldn't have any validity in your own timeline. Are there any special circumstances surrounding your "what-if" line? What do those games follow? OoT? Why?

I also ask that you explain why the FSS is on the AT, just out of curiosity. And why you don't include OoX.

 

[i-am-link]

This is the third one today that I've had to say "there's an official Nintendo timeline now".

Sorry, but timeline theories are a thing of the past. x.x

Maybe that image needs to be stickied and a request that no more timeline theories be posted? Seems only debate now is how the third split is created.

Well, f***. D*** Nintendo, ruining our fun...

Can someone please delete this thread? And notify me when things like this happen?