there is a topic about this because people are way too nit picky. we know there is a timeline, the creators said so. we know there is a split timeline, the creators said so. when you think about it, its really rediculous to have a conversation about whether or not there is a split/timeline when we KNOW there is.
and for the record, i am chill. its impossible to tell emotion from text, youre reading my text as me being angry or snippy, but that doesnt mean i AM angry or snippy. would adding an emoticon help you read my text better? here you go
Yes we are picky, because most of the zelda fans are gatherd to a zelda based forum to discuss it. That also includes me, thats the whole idea of ZD forum. To dicuss the things about zelda that goes deeper beyond the normal questions.
But yeah, i also get your idea. It may seems rediculous/dumb to you to discuss this sorta things.
Somthing like: "the creators already confirmed this, so case closed. there is nothing to discuss about it"
If its that rediculous/dumb to you, then why do you post in this thread?
you are making this a case of "this is right and this is wrong"
now i said that i believed more in the linear timeline then in the split timeline. now midna666 shares his toughts and opinions, and i agreed with him at some points. i didn 't say that the split timeline is incorrect, i only was saying that its has some inlogical points (what you called overanalyzing).
Thats why i made
2 images on paint to explain what my toughts were.
Now this is a proper discussion. sharing toughts, opinions, reasons, you can agree and disagree. But not "this is right and this is wrong, so no need to continue"
Anyway, i will withdraw from this topic for a while. Because this is getting way off topic.