K
KinRyuTen
Guest
I will always be under the impression that anything related to the Four Swords games are in a separate Zelda universe.
Phantom Ganon was a creation of of Ganondorf he made from a part of his shadow, I think that's it. But what I don't get is why is it phantom "Ganon" and not phantom "Ganondorf" because ganon is Ganondorf's full form.
This whole theory rests on some strange connections. Vaati must be PG because PG isn't killed? That really seems odd to me.
Short answer: No, I don't think they're the same at all. By the end of MC, Vaati isn't even humanoid anymore. Yes Ganon could change things shape no doubt if he wanted. But why would he. Vaati and Vaati's attacks were perfectly fine means of killing young heroes in over their head, so why turn the guy into a double of himself?
Besides, why would he go through the trouble of entering the shrine and unleashing Vaati, only to use him as a temple boss unless he really needed to? Surely it was far simpler to just create a phantom of himself, that he could dispel and recreate at any time. Surely he knew about the Shrine (definitely by FSA), so I'd be inclined to believe Ganon would leave him until he was absolutely necessary. In much the same way he acted in TP.
He didn't change Volvagia into a different form though. And Volvagia and Bongo Bongo seem pretty mindless to me. Not only did I never say he couldn't resurrect creatures, I don't see how his revival of creatures who gets to keep their form and aren't all that powerful considering, is a valid argument against his taking a final boss and stuffing it into his own image with his own abilities.