Search results for query: *

You have a point, but then again, things that were once intended don't always end up staying that way. OoT was originally supposed to be the Seal War...oops, that didn't work out so well, did it? New games can retcon old intent. Maybe it was once Aonuma's plan to put the Deku Tree's Success to...

Never did I say that you said it has been shown in any main Zelda game. It's just a fact, and the whole debate as to whether or not FPTRR shows the Deku Tree's Success is pointless because of it. That I didn't know, as I haven't played the game. I'll take your word for it. Again, I never said...

I never said it was another flood. I said that FPTRR could take place shortly after Hyrule was flooded, which would explain why there are still some memories of Hyrule. Then TWW would take place many years after that, after the water level rose or the land eroded naturally. FPTRR is ambiguously...

Okay, you do have a point, but it's a pointless point, because even if the Deku Tree's Success was in fact taken into account in FPTRR, it hasn't been shown in any main series Zelda game. Also, while it might in fact be the islands of the Great Sea coming together and the water level dropping...

That's still not proof. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but you've certainly not proved anything. Besides, if they were meant to be the same islands from TWW, don't you think that they would, you know, at least LOOK the same? Yeah, there are similarities...but nothing close enough to prove...

I never said that I had proof that it wasn't the same land. That's not the problem here. The problem is that he's stating "facts" without proof.

How do you know it's the same land from TWW?! You have no proof of that at all.