I have no problem debating Zelda mysteries, even theories like these. Thats fine.
I'm just disturbed that a few people here are acting like these theories have massive amounts of evidence in the games, like they are almost fact. Neither is the case.
The ideas that Kokiri were once Picori or eventually became monkeys are all romantic ideas that would make good fanfiction, but until there are some actual hard evidence from the games, thats about the extent of it.
We don't know HOW he created them, just that he did. Did he grow from seeds, birth them, form them from dust like Yahweh? Who knows? Some or all of the above could be the answer. Its all speculation since it was never important information in the game.