Refusing to provide meta is also insanely scummy.
I don't care who you're known as in other communities, I have meta to work with on literally everyone here.
Vote: Kreaal
This is a serious vote.
no **** this
I refuse this as policy on sites I go to, I'm not doing it for any other players and I'll be pissed if you do it to me. If you want to make a case it has to stand on its own merits.
Thanks.
I hate this because if anything it helps mafia coordinate.
Mafia knows who their partners are despite not having a chat, saying who they'd kill makes sure they don't target the same person and that the kill goes through.
This is correct.
I think ex having a strong reaction to a 3 vote rvs wagon is weird
I think the points ex makes are good w/r/t the setup but I do generally acknowledge that making good early set-up posts instead of proactively breaking RVS is scum indicative (also I am a huge hypocrite and talk setup a lot regardless of alignment)
Moe's confusion seems genuine and I like it.
Kreaal's hyperness reads derptown to me rather than scummy
I do think Ex getting 3 (eventually 4) votes off the bat is weird and I think makes more sense in a world where we have Scum!Ex for a couple reasons:
1) imo scum tend to rvs vote partners more often than would happen by truly random chance, because they're focused on them
2) once he gets an RVS vote or two it can potentially look awkward if ScumEx flips first and you started his rvs counterwagon
this also means in the event of an Ex scumflip i'd wager there is min 1 scum in morbid/rubik/moe/kirino
in the event I'm wrong and he's town I dislike the 3rd and 4th spot people on it (moe, kirino) because a silly-ish bandwagon RVS vote is a pretty safe place to park rvs vote to minimize the usual back and forth interaction you get from whoever you RVS.
would probably vote there but I think that puts him at like... L-2 which is too spicy for me this early in the phase when half the game isn't here yet