You all can believe that I was told false information, but I've been cooperative to town to the extent that I feel is safe. I am 100% town. Not mafia, not 3rd party, not spider aligned. I've been working in town's best interest and it does frustrate me that I can't be open here, but I have to toe a line that I think will ultimately help town.
One of my abilities is a passive one that permanently lowers spider aligned players threshold if they lynch me due to the guilt they feel. I feel that alone points to my towniness.
I outed I was being controlled by the Jackal before even talking to him. If I'm anti-town I keep that under wraps.
Which scenario is more likely?
A. Zinger puts town with mafia and just allows them to out them ezpz with no consequences. Sure I was reliant on the cure but the scenario applies after being cured.
B. Zinger puts town with mafia. The townie relies on them to help make sure they don't die, and also give them freedom. But there's a drawback if that townie just outs them, even after being cured. A two way street as it is. Both having to rely on one another.
One of my abilities is a passive one that permanently lowers spider aligned players threshold if they lynch me due to the guilt they feel. I feel that alone points to my towniness.
I outed I was being controlled by the Jackal before even talking to him. If I'm anti-town I keep that under wraps.
Which scenario is more likely?
A. Zinger puts town with mafia and just allows them to out them ezpz with no consequences. Sure I was reliant on the cure but the scenario applies after being cured.
B. Zinger puts town with mafia. The townie relies on them to help make sure they don't die, and also give them freedom. But there's a drawback if that townie just outs them, even after being cured. A two way street as it is. Both having to rely on one another.