if it's role madness then how do we even know that mf is townSorry misread one of your posts.
Btw you talked about exchanging information with someone you don't trust. That's part of the fun with oc is taking risks. Exchanging claims, telling someone you got a cop check on them, or even lying for information.
I think with double masons and double rolecop that this game will have quite a few more obscure roles and that makes it fun because it ruins the mascaim. If it was simple then the massclaim would be annoying. Technically still is but is leas annoying this time.
And this is much better than old twr. We used to be so much more oc heavy.
OC is incredibly rare and you guys are actually the strange ones though I'm willing to adapt, hence the crossoverI don't know of any foolproof plan
I'm disappointed to see the mixed reception ZD seems to have to OC, I've acknowledged it has negative aspects but I've come to prefer it overall.
then again, I have little experience playing games without OC.
I'm not trusting a single vote that you don't explain and it's just "muh super sekret information". What if your evaluation of that info is bad and we could provide a better perspective? Share it here or I'm not gonna sheep probably.This is why I'm not really digging the whole OC thing. People have information that others don't, and then make vague votes based on that. I can't do anything with that if you can't convince me why someone is suspicious. I understand all the people receiving info feel they have reasons to suspect the people they do, but the rest of us don't know what that is and can't just blindly trust people who claim to have inconsistent information. I'm not too keen on voting someone just based on how others interpret things they've learned.
lots of things are useful. It'd be really useful if I had everyone's role PMs for example.I don't have a problem with you waiting to elaborate until you figure out what's going on. In fact, I think that's the best course of action. But placing a vote because of info, then removing it and voting someone else, still based on that info just makes things confusing. I think it would be better to wait to place your vote until you do feel like you can expand upon it a little more.
I can see instances where OC can be useful, but I feel it's also a bit of a distraction to actually reading into things and making connections there to problem solve.
if it's role madness then how do we even know that mf is town
we had a scum/town mason pair here before, and no one expected it because we hadn't had it prior
yet we are expected to just say every players role to someone with no confirmed alignment and have them play the game for us
As if 1. Scum couldn't easily fake claim so the whole ****ing thing is pointless and
2. We know for sure that this person is going to follow the instructions properly and actually be helpful
what happens when they say someone is playing weird for their role so we lynch them and the player flips town?
Why couldn't the final boss of the game be scum?Do you follow Pokemon? If so you should know who he is by name at this point. I don't see a possible way that he could be scum.
Why couldn't the final boss of the game be scum?
I also checked space and finally got the results. She's not worth a lynch yet.
Isn't Blue a bad guy in the first games..?Because of the others who have died. All names have fallen into their proper series alignment thus far.
Isn't Blue a bad guy in the first games..?
Sorry that was vague. I toelchecked her and her role isn't autoscum. I'm nt going to out her role.Oh? Care to elaborate on "yet"?