@Fred:
There's no technical about it. The style of the post is far from my more serious posts. While I certainly do advocate for Rag's lynch AND encourage it, to take away from a ***campaign*** post that I'm actively indicating those who don't vote Rag are anti-lynch is absurd. That's on you for making that assumption. Implied or not (well if it was not, then you'd see me posting seriously about how anyone not voting Rag is anti-lynch which would speak for itself without your input).
This is mafia, a game about reading between the lines, and that's what I took away from your post on that. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I apologize, but that isn't going to stop me from saying it.
Alright, I skimmed the last five pages. Atm I have 4 votes on me, that's fine, but I should go ahead and be upfront that I'm within range of more votes on me turning out really bad, and in the long run it will be bad for everyone. My threshold is Maj, but this is also something I should go ahead and get out there, because we are tip-toeing into that area where people are piling on me and talking about potentially voting me. So yeah, I don't mind people voting me currently, I'm just letting it be known that there can be negative consequences if additional votes are cast my way.
I'll try to get a reads list together tonight.
I hate everything about this.
1) A note of 'hey i'm here I just skimmed the last few pages'
2) Vague threat of something bad happening if I get too many votes.
3) Promise to get a reads list 'later'
4) No actual content or thoughts on anything outside of defense.
I don't like tunneling so hard on day 1 but you're making it so hard not to.
That post Killjoy quoted from Dusky was also pretty icky as well btw, not sure how he read that post and somehow got onto Arrrrgh for it. Will have to remember that for later.
