This had come to mind for me w/ a few games. Say there's an old game you've been meaning to play that had gotten some kind of enhanced re-release (remaster, remake, etc.), but the original game is much cheaper and you have a means to play that one. Which one would you generally go for? And as such, do you have any specific examples where this applied w/ a game that you were interested in?
well well well, doesn't this sound familiar
hah but yeah remember metroid prime?? Ultimately I decided to go with the original on the wii because it came with not just the first one, but all three in the trilogy.
Honestly for other games it'll depend how cheap the original is, and how much they improved it in the remaster/remake. I'd say I'd usually go for the remake. But yknow if the remake had some very major changes/improvements, like how the LA remake on the switch looks totally different from the original, I'd ideally like to go back and play that too. On the other hand, if it was like how TP or SS only got a slight improvement on the graphics, I'd just stick with one version and wouldn't bother going and buying the original/remaster, depending on which one I have.
the thing with metroid prime is that it had more than one game in the download itself, was half the price of the remaster, and plus the eshop was closing down. But generally I'd say I go for remastered versions personally. And I'm still planning to buy metroid prime on switch one day in the future.
one game as an example is ori, I know it was cheaper on steam at the time I bought it, but they had it on switch and plus it was the definitive edition, so I decided to go with that. I also choose to buy the physical editions of games even though it costs more because holding the case and having a collection makes me happy hah