Search results for query: *

Give moderators warnings to denote if someone is writing a reply before locking a thread.

Is there a way to show the actual alert content in the pop-up?

I keep seeing "Database Error" where Kitsu's usertitle is supposed to be. Is anyone else having the same problem?

Actions by Sir Q in the past 24 hours: Made notions of "cleaning house" in a Skype conversation (http://pastebin.com/UuPnd2bg) Locked Repentance's thread after it was already moved by Vanessa prior. Told me is was a 'tough decision' after calling it out to him in a private channel Infracted...

Still isn't fixed...

That's the goal. Prevent any conditions that might cause problems, instead of putting up a sign or a rule for the user to have to follow. :D

The writer shouldn't have to do this, nor do they have to enter in any CSS for it to work. The admin/webmaster would have to add those fixes to the stylesheet "style.css".

Clear floating images for iFrames Fix: (add lines in green) style.css (line 257) .entry p iframe, #the_post p iframe { clear: both; display: block; margin: 0 auto; } style.css (line 258) .entry .alignleft, #the_post .alignleft { float: left...

Not sure I remember this, you mind quoting them for me?

Me either? I don't know who's making up that I have a personal vendetta against usergroups, but it's not true. The post you quoted was in reply to Atticus's idea for custom badges where he referred to them as usergroups. He latter clarified this for me.

Do you mean is allowing custom badges under the usernames? Allowing anyone to create a usergroup sort of defeats the purpose of usergroups.

I'd rather get rid of all username colors (except those that need it) and non essential ranks, but I've been saying this for a while.

Gotta test this thing out, you know...for science. https://soundcloud.com/m107/set-fire-to-the-rain-m107-mix Edit: Is there a way to show the track name and artist within the player or is this outside of your control?

Is there a way to have the embed soundcloud player (like we have with youtube) here (as opposed to just the URL)?

What are the downsides of leaving it enabled?

Don't know, I've always had that ability. That's Locke's forte though, so I would just PM him.

When you click on the edit switch, you should see a panel like this ↓. Make sure those options are checked

↓ My original post ↓ Axle's assumption is valid. The idea was to allow a 'majority' vote to override actions. Of course I think there would need to be certain conditions that might make a thread not be eligible for unlocking (e.g. length of thread, and how many different members posted)...

I wish I knew what variables you were referring to.

That's a rather lame excuse. A mod's privileges 'has the potential to be abused', but that doesn't stop you from creating moderators. If a mods decision is considered abusive by the community, then at least there is a way of countering it in a democratic way. Not saying it's perfect, but it's...

A better idea to me would be to hide the infringing post from the view of others (except the writer of the post, and relevant forum staff). This allows the user to make necessary edits to the post, and removes any need for an infraction. EDIT: On another note, could a thread be unlocked by...

Kitsu should administer the forums. That's my suggestion anyways.

Are notifications for group posts (or actions) an option?

I wouldn't want to take away rank forcefully though, I would hope that everybody that has some non-functional rank would to come to the conclusion that I've come to, and willingly give up their ranks in an attempt to make things better. If not, then I haven't provided enough information, or...

A better system I think, would be one without rank. There wouldn't be Hylian Nobles or Knights or any other non-functional rank or role. Functional roles (e.g. Administrators, Moderators, etc...) would remain anonymous (i.e. No badge or different color username), which might eliminate elitism if...

The check would work when the person submits or previews the signature in the editing phase, and it wouldn't include what was in the spoiler tags. You would however set a fixed height for a spoiler tag that's closed so that you couldn't implement an unlimited amount of them.

Why are the moderators handling something that could be handled by a script. When a person goes and creates a signature that's too big, then they get an error telling them so. You could even overlay a box (which measures the maximum width and height allowed), and then display that on top of the...