Search results for query: *

I wasn't addressing the why of a fourth timeline, but a when. I was saying that if a fourth split does happen, the end of Skyward Sword would be the logical place for it to happen. We already know that how ever we place BotW & TotK in any timeline (singular, three, four, or any other mess)...

Placing the Rito before Wind Waker does not override anything we see in game. We see Rito that are related to Zora in WW, sure. We also see hints that Zora exist off screen, in WW, and the following games (Items, shop menus, and the like). Plus, the Rito we see now are very different from what...

And? How does that disprove anything? Secondly, if there is even one possible connection, does that disprove your "zero?" I not only think this would be great, but I don't think a separate timline is the best/only way to get that. It could all work, with what we already have. I'm not saying...

I suppose the idea that Rauru's Hyrule is the nation that predates Skyward Sword isn't common enough to register, yet. As I see it, the creators already told us that the new games, BotW/TotK, are separated; by time. They specifically wanted us to fit the games in the timeline we saw most...